From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1221 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2003 14:48:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1198 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2003 14:48:43 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030428144843.1197.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: christianbiere@gmx.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, christianbiere@gmx.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/8178: [3.4 regression] __builtin_ffs broken with -march=k6 X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01252.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: __builtin_ffs broken New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] __builtin_ffs broken with -march=k6 State-Changed-From-To: closed->analyzed State-Changed-By: reichelt State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 14:48:43 2003 State-Changed-Why: As Falk pointed out, __builtin_ffs broken is still broken on mainline with -march=k6. The tests ffs-1.c, ffs-2.c from the testsuite Eric mentioned also still fail on mainline. Since this all works on the 3.3 branch, we have a regression. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8178