From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33703-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23746 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2003 17:46:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23614 invoked by uid 71); 28 Apr 2003 17:46:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030428174602.23611.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10027: [3.4, Alpha] Segfault with streams
Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01273.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10027; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/10027: [3.4, Alpha] Segfault with streams
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:41:10 -0500

 >I can't reproduce it any more with g++ (GCC) 3.4 20030423.  Do you
 >have any idea what might have caused it? But in any case, if it is not
 >reproducible any more, I guess we can only close it...
 
 dunno, mainline has been pretty flaky lately. I'll close it.
 
 thanks,
 benjamin