From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2243 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2003 17:59:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2219 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2003 17:59:58 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030428175958.2218.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jason@gcc.gnu.org, reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01274.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code State-Changed-From-To: closed->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 17:59:58 2003 State-Changed-Why: See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-04/msg01274.html I can confirm that this small snippet ------------------------ void foo(char a) { while (1); } ------------------------ makes 3.4 segfault (both the C and C++ front end), as well as 3.3 (but only the C front end. It seems as if 3.2.3 is unaffected. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10336