From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14688 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2003 14:36:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14615 invoked by uid 71); 29 Apr 2003 14:36:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030429143601.14614.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/10538: gcc 3.2.3 does not issue a warning for "int a = a + 1" statements Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01346.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10538; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Remo Inverardi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10538: gcc 3.2.3 does not issue a warning for "int a = a + 1" statements Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:32:28 -0500 (CDT) > I just gave the current GCC documentation a second look, but I was not > able to identify the extension your referring to (?) ... Maybe you're right. I tried to locate it in the manual some time ago and couldn't find it either, after it had been discussed on the mailing lists for the umpteenth time. It's documented in the mailing list archives, but that is not a very good place... > what's more, I > just tried compiling the same code with -ansi, -pedantic, and -Wall > options, neither of which gave me a warning ... That's why I didn't close the report. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/