From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1060 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2003 16:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1022 invoked by uid 71); 29 Apr 2003 16:56:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030429165601.1021.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/10512: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints (fwd) Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01352.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10512; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10512: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints (fwd) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:48:50 -0500 (CDT) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:02:46 +0200 From: Joachim Eibl To: bangerth@dealii.org Subject: Re: c++/10512: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints Hi, > As you mention, this report is basically a duplicate of the > ones you cite. What is different from the information given > in those that would merit keeping it open? I mainly posted this in the gcc-bug-database because the mention of the gdb-problem wasn't there yet. IMHO the gcc-developers should be aware that their changes also can break gdb-functionality. As a user I expect that these tools work together. I also posted it on the gdb-bug-database, because I tried to explain it more clearly. Daniel Jacobowitz already mentions "cloned functions", but I didn't really understand this at first. Probably I should rather have added a note instead of opening a new report - sorry for any inconvenience. (Why does adding a note require the use of email, when starting a new report does not?) I also tried the current gdb-version from 04-27 which still contains the problem. One reason why I investigated the matter and posted the report was because I stumbled across this problem several times and think that it is very annoying, because my program uses many constructors that do a lot of work and I can't simply step in as in the example I mentioned. (By the way: I'm author of KDiff3 at http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net). There I think is another gdb-problem, but I haven't investigated and simplyfied it yet. Let me end by thanking you developers for doing such an awesome job in providing such an advanced tool and supporting so many languages and platforms. Best regards, Joachim ----- Original Message ----- From: To: ; ; ; Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: Re: c++/10512: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints > Synopsis: g++ 3.2 creates multiple constructors: gdb 5.3 can't set breakpoints > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 14:32:44 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > As you mention, this report is basically a duplicate of the > ones you cite. What is different from the information given > in those that would merit keeping it open? > > W. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10512 >