From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33795-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2133 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2003 17:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2110 invoked by uid 71); 29 Apr 2003 17:36:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030429173600.2108.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: jason@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01366.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR middle-end/10336; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Cc: <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: middle-end/10336: [3.4 regression] ICE with -Wunreachable-code
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:27:26 +0200

 Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
 
 > -Wunreablable-code only works with -O. Could you please double check your
 > results with this?
 
 Ah, sorry. Confirmed with 3.3/3.4 (C frontend) and 3.4 only (C++ frontend).
 I think the synopsis should be changed to report the 3.3 regression.
 
 gcc version 3.3 20030421 (prerelease)
 gcc version 3.4 20030428 (experimental)
 
 > PS: Don't forget to keep gcc-gnats@... as a CC:
 
 
 That was intentional. I was trying not to pollute the audit trail in case it
 was a mistake on my side, as it turned out to be.
 
 Giovanni Bajo