From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24114 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2003 21:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24097 invoked by uid 71); 30 Apr 2003 21:06:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030430210600.24096.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Lukas Geyer Subject: Re: target/10194: [3.2 regression] [arm] gcc optimization error with -O2, affecting bison Reply-To: Lukas Geyer X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg01474.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/10194; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Lukas Geyer To: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de, 185903@bugs.debian.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/10194: [3.2 regression] [arm] gcc optimization error with -O2, affecting bison Date: 30 Apr 2003 16:57:23 -0400 ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de writes: > Synopsis: [3.2 regression] [arm] gcc optimization error with -O2, affecting bison > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: cae > State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 28 11:24:14 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > According to the Bug-Database, this report is most likely 3.2-only. > As the 3.2-branch is closed, i.e. there will be no further release > after 3.2.3 we should probably close this report. Could you possibly > verify that this is indeed fixed in 3.3 (as stated in the report) and 3.4? I re-checked with gcc-3.3, more precisely gcc-3.3 (GCC) 3.3 20030415 (Debian prerelease) (output of --version) and it compiles correctly. However, there seems to be no Debian package of 3.4 installed on the machines I use for testing. So I cannot test with gcc 3.4, as I do not have any ARM machines myself. Best regards, Lukas