From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18245 invoked by alias); 1 May 2003 13:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18226 invoked by uid 71); 1 May 2003 13:46:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 13:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030501134601.18221.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Technical Support Subject: RE: Re: libstdc++/10535 Reply-To: Technical Support X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10535; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Technical Support To: "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" Cc: Subject: RE: Re: libstdc++/10535 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 14:36:17 +0100 Addendum to this morning's post: This is a known problem in MinGW (I've just found several complaints about the bug report). Apparently it will never work even if we define _GCPPLIB_USE_WCHAR_T and _GCPPLIB_HAVE_WCHAR_T in configc++.h and this is down to the MinGW contributors to fix. Therefore, as far as the lack of support in MinGW is concerned, it is not a GNU problem so this part can be closed. So far as Cygwin is concerned we might have a chance by defining these macros and perhaps by knocking out some of the C99-specific functions which configure apparently searches for. We also might have a chance by installing the latest gclib as a separate component and using that for configure. I will let you know. Best Regards, James Bannon