From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10796 invoked by alias); 1 May 2003 14:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10779 invoked by uid 71); 1 May 2003 14:26:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 14:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030501142600.10778.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: optimization/9787: [Pentium 4] optimization bug with 176.gcc from SPECcpu2000 Reply-To: Andrew Pinski X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/9787; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Pinski To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, thomas.anders@blue-cable.de Cc: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: optimization/9787: [Pentium 4] optimization bug with 176.gcc from SPECcpu2000 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:22:40 -0400 This is bug is mostly likely an aliasing problem in the source code of gcc in SPEC. This has been discussed many times: Thanks, Andrew Pinski http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=9787