From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26024 invoked by alias); 1 May 2003 18:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26000 invoked by uid 71); 1 May 2003 18:06:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 18:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030501180601.25998.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/7412: [DR 106] References to references Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/7412; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Giovanni Bajo , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/7412: [DR 106] References to references Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 13:01:51 -0500 (CDT) > DR 106 has been resolved as a real defect, it's now in status WP. > I'm not sure what GCC policy is wrt DR: maybe only TC1 will be > implemented? In this case this should be suspended again till C++0x. I think in most cases the powers agreed that we should follow resolved DRs. Keep it in analyzed state. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/