From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33972-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15429 invoked by alias); 1 May 2003 19:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15415 invoked by uid 71); 1 May 2003 19:26:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 19:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030501192600.15414.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/9512: [3.4 regression] Segmentation fault if qualifying name of template explicit specialisation in namespace
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9512; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<vlukas@gmx.de>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/9512: [3.4 regression] Segmentation fault if qualifying name of template explicit specialisation in namespace
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 21:09:23 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9512
 
 The code is illegal: it's ill-formed to define a qualified namespace member
 (Comeau correctly refuses it). So, we still have an ICE with 3.4 CVS
 20030430, and we have an accept-illegal with 3.3 CVS 20030421 (which is not
 a regression, since GCC has always illegally accepted this syntax).
 
 Giovanni Bajo