From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-33976-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14051 invoked by alias); 1 May 2003 20:46:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13947 invoked by uid 71); 1 May 2003 20:46:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030501204601.13937.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/8007: Internal compiler error in walk_tree
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8007; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<sneechy@hotmail.com>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8007: Internal compiler error in walk_tree
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:28:13 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8007
 
 The ICE is now gone on both 3.3 and 3.4, and the code is rejected. The only
 reason why I keep this PR open is that I'm not sure if the code is legal or
 not. With GCC 2.95, A<> gets instantiated as A<int (B::)()>, which I am not
 sure it's a legal type. Can some GCC extension guru comment on this?
 
 Giovanni Bajo