From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31123 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 00:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31001 invoked by uid 71); 2 May 2003 00:46:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 00:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030502004601.31000.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: optimization/10593: -O2 dead-code optimization removes the wrong code Reply-To: Andrew Pinski X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10593; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Pinski To: bangerth@dealii.org, bkuschak@yahoo.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: optimization/10593: -O2 dead-code optimization removes the wrong code Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 20:40:51 -0400 Did you read the fix part: Problem does not occur with gcc-3.2.=A0 But I really want to fix this in = =20 2.95.3. Thanks, Andrew Pinski On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 20:33 US/Eastern, bangerth@dealii.org =20 wrote: > Synopsis: -O2 dead-code optimization removes the wrong code > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Fri May 2 00:33:47 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > 2.95 is a very old release. Can you say anything about > whether the problem still occurs with newer versions of > gcc? > > Thanks > Wolfgang > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-=20 > trail&database=3Dgcc&pr=3D10593 > >