From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29783 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 00:54:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29744 invoked by uid 48); 2 May 2003 00:54:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 00:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030502005434.29743.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkuschak@yahoo.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bkuschak@yahoo.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10593: -O2 dead-code optimization removes the wrong code X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: -O2 dead-code optimization removes the wrong code State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Fri May 2 00:54:34 2003 State-Changed-Why: No, sorry, I missed the "Fix" field. I fear, you're out of luck: we just abandoned the 3.2 branch, and before that the 3.0 branch. Nobody's going to fix bugs in 2.95 any more, unless -- maybe -- being paid for that. In any case, I don't think we should keep open bug reports for things we know are working now. Sorry Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10593