From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11586 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 12:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11571 invoked by uid 71); 2 May 2003 12:56:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 12:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030502125601.11570.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Carlo Wood Subject: other/5390: What about this PR? Reply-To: Carlo Wood X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Carlo Wood To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu, dj@redhat.com Subject: other/5390: What about this PR? Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 14:53:05 +0200 Just now I did a 'cvs diff' on the gcc-3.3 branch and found a modified file: cplus-dem.c This diff turned out to be related to PR other/5390 It turns out that my patch (made for 3.3 at the time) was applied to 3.4 only. I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch, but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status still sits at 'feedback'. -- Carlo Wood