From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17773 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 17:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17760 invoked by uid 71); 2 May 2003 17:26:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030502172600.17759.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: DJ Delorie Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR? Reply-To: DJ Delorie X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS. From: DJ Delorie To: carlo@alinoe.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, bangerth@ices.utexas.edu Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR? Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:16:07 -0400 > I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch, > but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status > still sits at 'feedback'. At this point, it's not up to me. If the 3.3 branch folks want to apply the patch, it's OK with me.