From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26153 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 18:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26138 invoked by uid 71); 2 May 2003 18:26:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 18:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030502182600.26137.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR? Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5390; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: DJ Delorie , carlo@alinoe.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/5390: What about this PR? Date: 02 May 2003 11:18:25 -0700 On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 11:13, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2003, DJ Delorie wrote: > > > > > > I think it might as well be applied to the 3.3 branch, > > > but if not - then this PR can be closed: its status > > > still sits at 'feedback'. > > > > At this point, it's not up to me. If the 3.3 branch folks want to > > apply the patch, it's OK with me. > > So this is Mark's call. > > If it's not going into 3.3, please queue it for 3.3.1. Too late for 3.3, but OK for 3.3.1. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC