From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20664 invoked by alias); 2 May 2003 23:47:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20643 invoked by uid 48); 2 May 2003 23:47:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 23:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030502234711.20640.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, zippel@linux-m68k.org From: falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de Reply-To: falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de, Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, zippel@linux-m68k.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: inline-asm/5570: wrong code generated for asm statements, 3.0.3 X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: wrong code generated for asm statements, 3.0.3 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: falk State-Changed-When: Fri May 2 23:47:10 2003 State-Changed-Why: My m68k is somewhat rusty, but the bug here seems to be that #106 is put into register D5, although D0 was explicitly requested (trap parameter). I can reproduce this with gcc 3.0.4, but not with 3.2.3 anymore. So I close this bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5570