From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34155-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17933 invoked by alias); 4 May 2003 17:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17919 invoked by uid 71); 4 May 2003 17:26:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 04 May 2003 17:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030504172600.17918.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/10619
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10619; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, <gccbugs@contacts.eelis.net>
Subject: Re: c++/10619
Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 12:21:40 -0500 (CDT)

 > template <typename T> void foo(int );    // #1
 > template <int N> void foo(int );   // #2
 
 Yes, sorry, I was confused. I thought these two lines are illegal, but of 
 course they're not. I was thinking about template _classes_, not 
 functions. The former can't be overloaded that way, the latter can.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/