From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6463 invoked by alias); 5 May 2003 00:02:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6442 invoked by uid 48); 5 May 2003 00:02:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 00:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030505000257.6441.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at From: giovannibajo@libero.it Reply-To: giovannibajo@libero.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9801: [3.4 regression][New parser] Confusing error message for missing typename X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.4 regression][New parser] Confusing error message for missing typename State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: bajo State-Changed-When: Mon May 5 00:02:57 2003 State-Changed-Why: The example is actually legal code as-is, because the qualifier is the injected class name. See DR 224, and PR c++/9634. I played a bit with the code but I did not find a regression in any situation similar to the one Gerald proposed, so I close this PR. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9801