From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34261-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14411 invoked by alias); 6 May 2003 07:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14394 invoked by uid 71); 6 May 2003 07:26:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 07:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030506072601.14393.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/5256; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, keuchel@netwave.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 00:22:14 -0700 (PDT)

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5256
 
 Hi all,
 
 the problem reported in this PR can't be replicated
 with current gcc 3.3 snapshot darwin x arm-wince-pe
 cross compiler. Compiling this testcase does not
 produce a segfault or ICE. Perhaps this bug no longer
 exists?
 
 Dara
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com