From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3267 invoked by alias); 6 May 2003 13:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3248 invoked by uid 71); 6 May 2003 13:16:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 13:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030506131600.3246.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: David Mentre Subject: Re: optimization/8896: '-mcpu=xscale -fno-strict-aliasing -O2' ge nerates wrong code Reply-To: David Mentre X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8896; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Mentre To: "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'enrico.scholz@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de'" , "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" , "'rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org'" Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8896: '-mcpu=xscale -fno-strict-aliasing -O2' ge nerates wrong code Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 15:03:23 +0200 Hello, The patch describe in the below gnats entry has never been applied to official gcc tree. However, this patch is systematically applied to = each gcc generated for arm-* target.=20 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=3Dview%20audit-trail&database= =3Dgcc&p r=3D8896 Is this patch really needed? If true, why isn't it applied to official = gcc tree? If not, then people using this patch should know that this patch = is not needed. Best regards, david --=20 David Mentr=E9 - Research engineer Mitsubishi Electric ITE-TCL / European Telecommunication Research = Laboratory Phone: +33 2 23 45 58 29 / Fax: +33 2 23 45 58 59=20 http://www.mitsubishi-electric-itce.fr