From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5715 invoked by alias); 6 May 2003 23:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5697 invoked by uid 71); 6 May 2003 23:16:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 23:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030506231601.5696.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5256; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: "Dara Hazeghi" Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:14:40 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5256 The best solution would be to able to reproduce the bug on 3.2 or 3.1 crosscompiler, trim down the testcase to a bare minimum, and compile it with mainline. Giovanni Bajo