From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34340-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15543 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 00:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15523 invoked by uid 71); 7 May 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 00:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030507002600.15522.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Subject: Re: c++/10646: [3.3/3.4 regression] non-const reference is incorrectly matched in a "const T" partial specialization
Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10646; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<notbob@tessellation.com>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10646: [3.3/3.4 regression] non-const reference is incorrectly matched in a "const T" partial specialization
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 02:23:22 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10646
 
 As an additional note, the same bug exists for any combination of
 cv-qualifier. So, you can construct a template called is_volatile like the
 above to reproduce the same bug.
 
 Giovanni Bajo