From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34350-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12141 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 05:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12123 invoked by uid 71); 7 May 2003 05:06:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 05:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030507050601.12122.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: c++/10645: Incorrect 64bit double alignment in nested struct
Reply-To: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00438.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10645; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
To: jingye@ca.ibm.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10645: Incorrect 64bit double alignment in nested struct
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 14:26:33 +0930

 See the comment in gcc/config/rs6000/linux64.h about ROUND_TYPE_ALIGN,
 and also ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN.  It's a weird AIX compatibility thing.
 
 -- 
 Alan Modra
 IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre