From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30172 invoked by alias); 7 May 2003 19:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30156 invoked by uid 71); 7 May 2003 19:56:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 19:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030507195601.30152.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: target/7265: [ia64] HP-UX cross Linux compiler cannot build l ibgcc Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00500.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/7265; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: "NASET,JEFFREY (HP-Richardson,ex1)" Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/7265: [ia64] HP-UX cross Linux compiler cannot build l ibgcc Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 12:52:12 -0700 Hi, Thank you for the response. I guess this bug can be closed, as the problem was due to a miscompiled compiler (miscompiled by 3.0). Hope 3.3 works well! Dara > > When this problem kept occurring with gcc releases up to 3.3 > snapshots in > April 2003, I started to work on it and found that the native gcc on > the > machine I was building the cross-compiler on was generating bad code! > (Inserting printf()'s in gcc to debug the problem made it go away) > > It works on another machine just fine. > > I don't know why the .i would have errors in it, though... but it's a > moot > point. (The simplest code that the problem manifested on was "int > foo[2];" > and it was failing in c-decl.c in grokdeclarator() after constant > folding > gave a bad result when folding the expression for "2-1" -- but that > was just > because gcc was miscompiled by the native gcc) > > Sorry for the bogus bug report. > > I'm not going to file a bug report on the native gcc since it was old > (3.0.x) and there is no audit trail showing who built it and how. > > -- Jeff