From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17305 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 01:51:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17284 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2003 01:51:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 01:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508015123.17282.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gawrilow@math.tu-berlin.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, giovannibajo@libero.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: giovannibajo@libero.it Reply-To: giovannibajo@libero.it, gawrilow@math.tu-berlin.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, giovannibajo@libero.it, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10661: Regression vs. 3.1: ICE on legal code X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Regression vs. 3.1: ICE on legal code Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bajo Responsible-Changed-By: bajo Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 8 01:51:22 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Analyzing this... http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10661