From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28838 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 02:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28594 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 02:26:00 -0000 Resent-Date: 8 May 2003 02:26:00 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20030508022600.28593.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, marcus@gnu.org Received: (qmail 5845 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2003 02:17:56 -0000 Message-Id: <20030508021756.5844.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 02:26:00 -0000 From: marcus@gnu.org Reply-To: marcus@gnu.org To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: c/10676: Using unnamed fields in initializers X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00540.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 10676 >Category: c >Synopsis: Using unnamed fields in initializers >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Thu May 08 02:26:00 UTC 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: marcus@gnu.org >Release: gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030124 (Debian prerelease) >Organization: >Environment: Debian GNU/Linux i386-linux-gnu >Description: union { int raw; struct { int foo; }; } baz = { .raw = 0 }, /* OK */ zab = { .foo = 1 }; /* unknown field `foo' specified in initializer */ Unnamed unions/structs are very useful. If the initializer for zab were valid, they would be even more useful. Thanks for your consideration, Marcus >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: