From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3116 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 08:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3094 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 08:56:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 08:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508085601.3093.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/2995; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/2995: __complex__ int typecasts maybe broken Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:54:14 +0100 (BST) On Thu, 8 May 2003, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > trail&database=gcc&pr=2995 > > Confirmed with mainline 20030507 We know what the underlying problem is here (thread starting at ) - the question is whether we can deprecate complex integers altogether, or just complex integer division. -- Joseph S. Myers jsm28@cam.ac.uk