From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34535-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7299 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 16:06:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7280 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 16:06:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030508160600.7279.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/10560
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00623.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10560; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10560
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 10:59:49 -0500 (CDT)

 I bet, this is in essence the same problem as PR 5660.
 
 W.