From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 507 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 16:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 410 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 16:26:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508162601.409.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: giovannibajo@libero.it Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/10661: [3.3/3.4? regression] ICE in instantiate_decl Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00626.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10661; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10661: [3.3/3.4? regression] ICE in instantiate_decl Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 18:13:28 +0200 bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > - it's a regression on 3.3. Code doesn't compile on 3.4, > so I can't yet say what's on there Ewgenij, I suggest you to try compiling your library with GCC 3.4 as well, and submit testcases for it in case of failure. This is the right timeframe to do so if you want to be absolutely sure your software will run in 3.4.0 as well. And as Wolfgang suggested, as a general rule of thumb, since you have such a larger and complex codebase, you might want to upgrade GCC from CVS every other week and check that everything always works. Giovanni Bajo