From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3897 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 16:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3860 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 16:56:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508165601.3859.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: bootstrap/8207: Unable to Build GCC 3.2 with GLibC 2.3.1 Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/8207; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: ZMan ZMan Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bootstrap/8207: Unable to Build GCC 3.2 with GLibC 2.3.1 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) --- ZMan ZMan wrote: > Dara Hazeghi wrote: > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > > > trail&database=gcc&pr=8207 > > > > Hello, > > > > the issue reported in this PR is reportedly fixed > in 3.2.3. Could the > > submitter please verify this? Thanks, > > > > Dara > > > > > Now it works flawlessly, but with GLibC 2.3.2 (don't > know about 2.3.1 !) > & GCC 3.2.3,3.2.2 (and maybe 3.2.1 too - but as it > was months ago, i > don't recall for sure) > > Thanks for Tracking Old issues... :) Thanks for the response, sorry it took so long to get to your report. There are literally hundreds of open, unanalyzed bug reports which have had no response over the last 5 months :-( This bug can be closed then. Dara __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com