From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34555-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26457 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 20:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26403 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 20:26:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 20:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030508202601.26397.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/10690
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00643.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10690; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <sebor@roguewave.com>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/10690
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 15:16:38 -0500 (CDT)

 Giovanni's right, though the original code had one more complexity: there 
 were two function templates "foo", so
   typeid(foo<T>)
 could not possibly give a meaningful result. I bet, you wanted to write 
   typeid(foo<T>(t))
 instead, which still gives the ambiguity error with 3.2.3, but compiles 
 fine with 3.3 and 3.4.
 
 The error Giovanni brought up persists, though.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/