From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29871 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 21:54:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29847 invoked by uid 48); 8 May 2003 21:54:36 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 21:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508215436.29846.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aroach@stoic.electriceyeball.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, aroach@stoic.electriceyeball.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/3332: [2003-05-06] friend function declaration in a class in a namespace causes error X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: friend function declaration in a class in a namespace causes error New Synopsis: [2003-05-06] friend function declaration in a class in a namespace causes error Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nathan Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Thu May 8 21:54:36 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: gcc3.4, icc, como and cxx all agree that the code is not valid, if put into strict standard mode. That is also my interpretation. Nathan, do you still stand to your reading of the standard? W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3332