From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22557 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 22:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22530 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 22:36:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 22:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508223600.22529.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/10649: is_pointer reports pointer to member function is not a pointer Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00661.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10649; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , "Gabriel Dos Reis" Cc: , Subject: Re: c++/10649: is_pointer reports pointer to member function is not a pointer Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 00:27:22 +0200 Robert Schwartz wrote: > I'm not saying anything about how pointer-to-member is *implemented*; I'm > saying something about its syntax and its semantics. A pointer to a member > is a pointer. That's all I'm saying. I'm lost here. Are you arguing that your code should work, or is it just some theorical conversation about the meaning of the word "pointer"? I think we agree that your code should not work and the PR is rightfully closed. If it's not about the PR, please leave gcc-gnats@ outside the CC, thanks. Giovanni Bajo