From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22570 invoked by alias); 8 May 2003 22:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22534 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2003 22:36:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 22:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030508223601.22533.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Phil Edwards Subject: Re: c++/10649: is_pointer reports pointer to member function is not a pointer Reply-To: Phil Edwards X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00662.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10649; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Phil Edwards To: Giovanni Bajo Cc: notbob@tessellation.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10649: is_pointer reports pointer to member function is not a pointer Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 18:34:39 -0400 On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:11:05AM +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > Phil Edwards wrote: > > > Also, the cxx-reflection-branch will, eventually, implement these > templates > > (taken from the ISO proposal). I have a patch which does, but the new > > parser won't let me do pointers-to-members like I'd planned. > > What is the problem with pointers-to-members, exactly? I assume there is > already an open PR for it, otherwise you should file one. I'm assuming the problem is in my code, since p-t-m's are successfully used by others. -- If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams