From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4175 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 00:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4156 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 00:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030509000600.4155.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00680.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6758; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/6758: [2003-01-01] ICE on nested type in template declaration Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 01:58:05 +0200 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6758 To be fair, the code is legal in 3.3 because of the implicit typename extension. I guess this bug should be kept open (not analyzed - there is no testcase), in case someone wants to fix the ICE in the 3.3 branch. Giovanni Bajo