From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30527 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 01:26:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30513 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2003 01:26:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 01:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030509012600.30512.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: optimization/8035 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00689.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8035; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8035 Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 20:22:15 -0500 (CDT) Having no clue what this is about (can't read ppc assembler), one thing that strikes me is that ___GetX1 doesn't return anything. I think, the compiler would then be allowe to assume whatever it wants as return value. I don't know whether that's an answer, but it may be something to look into. W.