From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34683-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10738 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 16:06:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10615 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2003 16:06:02 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 16:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030509160602.10611.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: zack@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Subject: Re: preprocessor/7312: bootstrap failure due to invalid use of
 errno
Reply-To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00770.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/7312; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: preprocessor/7312: bootstrap failure due to invalid use of
 errno
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 18:04:09 +0200 (CEST)

 Zack Weinberg writes:
 > At that point in the code,
 > nothing has been done to give errno a meaningful value, so ->err_no
 > should just be cleared to 0.
 
 Well, I thought (and still think) that 'errno' here means the error
 status from cpp_simplify_path. See the comments at the head of the
 function cpp_simplify_path.
 
 I also think that validate_pch() should not ignore this error status.
 
 Bruno