From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34706-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25508 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 18:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25438 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2003 18:36:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 18:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030509183601.25437.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gerald@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: other/6590: [doc] --with-as et al
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00795.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/6590; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gerald@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bruno@clisp.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: other/6590: [doc] --with-as et al
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:27:39 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=6590
 
 Hello,
 
 Bruno, does is the documentation still deficient as you initially  
 reported, or does the paragraph cited by Gerald suffice? Thanks,
 
 Dara