From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18928 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 19:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18886 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2003 19:16:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 19:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030509191601.18885.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Laurent GUERBY Subject: Re: ada/8344: mips-rtems build problem Reply-To: Laurent GUERBY X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00823.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/8344; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Laurent GUERBY To: Dara Hazeghi Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, joel@OARcorp.com Subject: Re: ada/8344: mips-rtems build problem Date: 09 May 2003 21:09:03 +0200 On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 21:02, Dara Hazeghi wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > trail&database=gcc&pr=8344 > > Hello, > > this PR lists a number of patches that appear to have been applied. Is > this so? If so, can anyone confirm that the bug in question no longer > appears? Thanks, The problem (ada/final.c => ada/adafinal.c) has been fixed for 3.2, 3.3 branches, mainline and ACT sources, I'm closing it, thanks for reminding us. Laurent