From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34759-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21380 invoked by alias); 9 May 2003 23:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21307 invoked by uid 71); 9 May 2003 23:46:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 23:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030509234601.21306.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: zack@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: debug/10718: nested locals with same name broken with gcc HEAD
 2003-04-11
Reply-To: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00847.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR debug/10718; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
To: mec@shout.net
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: debug/10718: nested locals with same name broken with gcc HEAD
 2003-04-11
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 16:38:38 -0700

 I am working on yet another revision of this area which will hopefully
 address the problem you are seeing.
 
 zw