From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22325 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 03:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22304 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 03:26:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 03:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510032601.22303.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: inline-asm/6481: ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1 when passing structs as inline asm arguments to registers Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00870.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/6481; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gtsouk@cslab.ece.ntua.gr, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: inline-asm/6481: ICE in instantiate_virtual_regs_1 when passing structs as inline asm arguments to registers Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 20:17:33 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=6481 Hello, compiling the testcase in this report results in an ICE on 3.2.3 and earlier. On 3.3 branch and mainline (20030509), I get: bug.c: In function `foofunc': bug.c:4: error: impossible constraint in `asm' Is this the proper behavior (if it is, this bug should be recategorized ICE-on-illegal)? Thanks, Dara