From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32227 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 04:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32198 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 04:16:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 04:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510041601.32193.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: c/7733: Segmentation Fault with -ftest-coverage Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00873.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/7733; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, swallis@arm.com, sdouglass@arm.com Cc: Subject: Re: c/7733: Segmentation Fault with -ftest-coverage Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 21:09:45 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=7733 Hello, using gcc 3.2.3, 3.3 branch or mainline (20030509), and compiling the testcase with -ftest-coverage, I do not get any ICE or segfault. Can the submitter confirm whether they are still encountering this bug with a current gcc version? Dara