From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5118 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 05:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5037 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 05:46:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 05:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510054601.5036.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: target/9365: [SH] segfault in gen_far_branch (config/sh/sh.c) Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00887.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/9365; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, marcus@mc.pp.se Cc: Subject: Re: target/9365: [SH] segfault in gen_far_branch (config/sh/sh.c) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 22:42:27 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=9365 Hello, I can confirm that on 3.3 branch the testcase in this report fails, but on 3.2.3 and mainline (20030509) it compiles fine. Dara