From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8711 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 07:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8682 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 07:26:00 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 07:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510072600.8667.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: optimization/6618: ICE in delete_insn, at cfgrtl.c:141 using shle-netbsdelf target Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00894.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6618; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, thorpej@wasabisystems.com Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/6618: ICE in delete_insn, at cfgrtl.c:141 using shle-netbsdelf target Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 00:18:14 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=6618 Hello, with current gcc 3.3 branch and mainline (20030509) cross compilers to shle-netbsdelf, the testcase in this report compiles fine. It also compiles fine under gcc 3.2.3, 3.3 branch and mainline cross compilers to sh-linux. Can the submitter verify whether this PR can be closed? Thanks, Dara