From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34809-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2627 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 07:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2613 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 07:36:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 07:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030510073601.2612.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: target/5360: [SH-4] NON_OPTIMAL CODE GENERATED FOR SH4
Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00897.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/5360; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, naveens@noida.hcltech.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/5360: [SH-4] NON_OPTIMAL CODE GENERATED FOR SH4
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 00:29:38 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=5360
 
 Hello,
 
 could the submitter of this report please confirm that the problem  
 reported in this PR is still present in a current version of gcc (ie  
 3.2.3)? Thanks,
 
 Dara