From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4370 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 08:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4320 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 08:56:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 08:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510085601.4319.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: target/8299: [sh-gcc] Optimizing problem Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00945.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/8299; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: tanaka@personal-media.co.jp, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/8299: [sh-gcc] Optimizing problem Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 01:49:53 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=8299 Hello, could the submitter of this report please determine whether this problem occurs in more current versions of gcc (3.2.3, or 3.3 prerelease). If so, could the submitter please provide a sample of the assembly output that should be produced for this testcase, but isn't? Thanks, Dara