From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9087 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 09:56:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9014 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 09:56:02 -0000 Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 09:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030510095602.9013.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Dara Hazeghi Subject: Re: optimization/6065: [sparc] gcc seems to reorder IEEE fpsetsticky and sqrt functions Reply-To: Dara Hazeghi X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00953.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6065; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dara Hazeghi To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Daniel.Villeneuve@gerad.ca Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/6065: [sparc] gcc seems to reorder IEEE fpsetsticky and sqrt functions Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 02:54:46 -0700 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- trail&database=gcc&pr=6065 Hello, I can confirm that your testcase fails with gcc 3.3 branch and mainline cvs (20030509) while succeeding with Sun cc. That said, I don't know what can be done about it. Dara