From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-34901-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5740 invoked by alias); 10 May 2003 20:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5708 invoked by uid 71); 10 May 2003 20:06:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 20:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030510200601.5707.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: other/10584: bootstraping with -finstrument-functions as an extra CFLAG
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00989.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR other/10584; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/10584: bootstraping with -finstrument-functions as an extra CFLAG
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:58:47 -0400

 In fact it worked at least till gcc version 3.4 20030417  
 (experimental), this was the last time I was able to make with  
 -finstrument-functions as an extra CFLAG.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski
 
 
 On Saturday, May 10, 2003, at 15:44 US/Eastern, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 > trail&database=gcc&pr=10584
 >
 > Hello,
 >
 > this worked fine on 3.2.3 and 3.3 branch, so I guess that makes this a  
 > 3.4 regression (admittedly -finstrument-functions does more, but  
 > still...)
 >
 > Dara
 >
 >
 >